[Allen2014]Allen, Blake & Michael Becker (2014). Learning alternations from surface forms with sublexical phonology. Ms. University of British Columbia and Stony Brook University. See also
[Archangeli2013]Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank. 2013. The role of UG in phonology. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 31. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
[PRAAT]Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2014). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Available from
[Brent1999]Brent, Michael R. 1999. An efficient, probabilistically sound algorithm for segmentation and word discovery. Machine Learning 34.71-105.
[SUBTLEX]Brysbaert, Marc, & Boris New. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4): 977-990.
[Bybee2001]Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
[SPE]Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
[Connine2008]Connine, Cynthia M., Larissa J. Ranbom, and David J. Patterson. 2008. Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 70:403-411.
[Delvaux2007]Delvaux, V., Soquet, A., 2007. The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica 64 (2-3), 145–173.
[Ellis2005]Ellis, D. P. W. (2005). PLP and RASTA (and MFCC), and inversion) in Matlab. Online web resource.
[Ernestus2011]Ernestus, Mirjam. 2011. Gradience and categoricality in phonological theory. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, ed. by M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice, 2115-36. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
[HTK]Evermann, G., Gales, M., Hain, T., Kershaw, D., Liu, X., Moore, G., ... & Woodland, P. (1997). The HTK book (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Entropic Cambridge Research Laboratory.
[Frisch2011]Frisch, Stefan A. 2011. Frequency effects. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, ed. by M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice, 2137-63. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
[Frisch2004]Frisch, Stefan, Janet B. Pierrehumbert & Michael B. Broe. 2004. Similarity avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.179-228.
[TIMIT]Garofolo, John, et al. 1993. TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus LDC93S1. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
[Giorgino2009]Giorgino, T. (2009). Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: the dtw package. Journal of statistical Software, 31(7), 1-24.
[Goldsmith2002]Goldsmith, John. 2002. Probabilistic models of grammar: phonology as information minimization. Phonological Studies 5.21-46.
[Goldsmith2012]Goldsmith, John & Jason Riggle. 2012. Information theoretic approaches to phonological structure: the case of Finnish vowel harmony. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30.859-96.
[Greenberg1964]Greenberg, J.H. & J. Jenkins. 1964. Studies in the psychological correlated of the sound system of American English. Word 20.157-77.
[Hall2013a]Hall, Daniel Currie & Kathleen Currie Hall. 2013. Marginal contrasts and the Contrastivist Hypothesis. Paper presented to the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, London, 2013.
[Hall2009]Hall, Kathleen Currie. 2009. A probabilistic model of phonological relationships from contrast to allophony. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Doctoral dissertation.
[Hall2012]Hall, Kathleen Currie. 2012. Phonological relationships: A probabilistic model. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 22.
[Hall2013b]Hall, Kathleen Currie. 2013. Documenting phonological change: A comparison of two Japanese phonemic splits. In: Luo, S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Canadian Linguistic Association, Toronto, published online at
[Hall2014a]Hall, Kathleen Currie, and Elizabeth Hume. 2014. Modeling Perceptual Similarity: Phonetic, Phonological and Other Influences on the Perception of French Vowels. Ms., University of British Columbia & University of Canterbury.
[Hall2014b]Hall, Kathleen Currie, Claire Allen, Tess Fairburn, Kevin McMullin, Michael Fry, & Masaki Noguchi. 2014. Measuring perceived morphological relatedness. Paper presented at the Canadian Linguistics Association annual meeting.
[Hayes2009]Hayes, Bruce. 2009. Introductory Phonology. Malden, MA: Blackwell - Wiley.
[Hockett1955]Hockett, Charles F. (1955). A manual of phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics, 21(4).
[Hockett1966]Hockett, Charles F. 1966. The quantification of functional load: A linguistic problem. U.S. Air Force Memorandum RM-5168-PR.
[Hume2015]Hume, Elizabeth, Kathleen Currie Hall & Andrew Wedel. to appear. Strategic responses to uncertainty: Strong and weak sound patterns. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Phonology and Morphology. Korea.
[Hume2013]Hume, Elizabeth, Hall, Kathleen Currie, Wedel, Andrew, Ussishkin, Adam, Adda-Decker, Martine, & Gendrot, Cédric. (2013). Anti-markedness patterns in French epenthesis: An information-theoretic approach. In C. Cathcart, I.-H. Chen, G. Finley, S. Kang, C. S. Sandy & E. Stickles (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 104-123). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
[Janda1999]Janda, Richard D. (1999). Accounts of phonemic split have been greatly exaggerated – but not enough. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 329-332.
[Johnson2010]Johnson, Keith, & Molly Babel. 2010. On the perceptual basis of distinctive features: Evidence from the perception of fricatives by Dutch and English speakers. Journal of Phonetics 38: 127-136.
[Khorsi2012]Khorsi, Ahmed. 2012. On morphological relatedness. Natural Language Engineering.1-19.
[King1967]King, Robert D. (1967). Functional load and sound change. Language, 43(4), 831-852.
[Kucera1963]Kučera, Henry. (1963). Entropy, redundancy, and functional load in Russian and Czech. American contributions to the Fifth International Conference of Slavists (Sofia), 191-219.
[Kullback1951]Kullback, S.; Leibler, R.A. (1951). “On information and sufficiency”. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1): 79–86. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694.
[HKCAC]Leung, Man-Tak, and Sam-Po Law. 2001. HKCAC: The Hong Kong Cantonese Adult Language Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6:305-325.
[Lewandowski2012]Lewandowski, Natalie. 2012. Talent in nonnative phonetic convergence: Universität Stuttgart Doctoral dissertation.
[Lu2012]Lu, Yu-an. 2012. The role of alternation in phonological relationships: Stony Brook University Doctoral dissertation.
[Luce1998]Luce, Paul A. & David B. Pisoni. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear 19.1-36.
[Maekawa2003]Maekawa, Kikuo. 2003. Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese: Its Design and Evaluation. Proceedings of ISCA and IEEE Workshop on Spontaneous Speech Processing and Recognition (SSPR2003).7-12.
[CSJ]Maekawa, Kikuo. 2004. Design, compilation, and some preliminary analyses of the Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese. Spontaneous speech: Data and analysis, ed. by K. Maekawa & K. Yoneyama, 87-108. Tokyo: The National Institute of Japanese Language.
[Matlab]The MathWorks Inc. (2014). MATLAB, Version R2014a.
[Mielke2008]Mielke, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford UP.
[Mielke2012]Mielke, J. 2012. A phonetically based metric of sound similarity. Lingua, 122(2), 145-163.
[LEXIQUE]New, Boris, Christophe Pallier, Marc Brysbaert, and Ludovic Ferrand. 2004. Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36:516-524.
[Peperkamp2003]Peperkamp, Sharon, Michèle Pettinato & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2003. Allophonic variation and the acquisition of phoneme categories. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 650-61. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
[Peperkamp2006]Peperkamp, Sharon, Le Calvez, Rozenn, Nadal, Jean-Pierre, & Dupoux, Emmanuel. (2006). The acquisition of allophonic rules: Statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition, 101, B31-B41.
[Pike1947]Pike, Kenneth L. (1947). Phonemics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
[Pinnow2014]Pinnow, Eleni, and Cynthia M. Connine. 2014. Phonological variant recognition: Representations and rules. Language and Speech 57:42-67.
[Pitt2009]Pitt, Mark A. 2009. The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants. Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35:896-910.
[BUCKEYE]Pitt, M.A., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E. and Fosler-Lussier, E. (2007) Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech (2nd release) [] Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University (Distributor).
[Pitt2011]Pitt, Mark A., Laura Dilley, and Michael Tat. 2011. Exploring the role of exposure frequency in recognizing pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics 39:304-311.
[R]R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 3.1.0.
[Rytting2004]Rytting, C. Anton. 2004. Segment predictability as a cue in word segmentation: Application to Modern Greek. Proceedings of the Workshop of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Phonology (SIGPHON).
[Sakoe1971]Sakoe, H., & Chiba, S. (1971). A dynamic programming approach to continuous speech recognition. In Proceedings of the seventh international congress on acoustics (Vol. 3, pp. 65-69).
[Shannon1949]Shannon, Claude E., & Weaver, Warren. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication (1998 ed.). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
[Silverman2006]Silverman, Daniel. 2006. A critical introduction to phonology: Of sound, mind, and body. London/New York: Continuum.
[Sumner2009]Sumner, Mehan, and Arthur G. Samuel. 2009. The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language 60:487-501.
[Surendran2003]Surendran, Dinoj & Partha Niyogi. 2003. Measuring the functional load of phonological contrasts. In Tech. Rep. No. TR-2003-12. Chicago.
[Thakur2011]Thakur, Purnima (2011). Sibilants in Gujarati phonology. Paper presented at Information-theoretic approaches to linguistics, University of Colorado - Boulder.
[Todd2012]Todd, Simon. 2012. Functional load and length-based Māori vowel contrast. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the New Zealand Linguistic Society. Auckland, Dec. 2012.
[IPHOD]Vaden, K. I., H. R. Halpin & G. S. Hickok. 2009. Irvine Phonotactic Online Dictionary, Version 2.0. [Data file.] Available from:
[Vitevitch1999]Vitevitch, M.S. and Luce, P.A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 374-408.
[Vitevitch2004]Vitevitch, M.S. & Luce, P.A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 481-487.
[Wedel2013]Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan & Scott Jackson. (2013). High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition 128.179-86.
[CMU]Weide, Robert L. (1994). CMU Pronouncing Dictionary.
[Yao2011]Yao, Yao. (2011). The effects of phonological neighborhoods on pronunciation variation in conversational speech. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Doctoral dissertation.